Cobalt-molybdenum sulfide catalyst materials and methods for ethanol production from syngas

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides methods and compositions for the chemical conversion of syngas to alcohols. The invention includes catalyst compositions, methods of making the catalyst compositions, and methods of using the catalyst compositions. Certain embodiments teach compositions for catalyzing the conversion of syngas into products comprising at least one C 1 -C 4  alcohol, such as ethanol. These compositions generally include cobalt, molybdenum, and sulfur. Preferred catalyst compositions for converting syngas into alcohols include cobalt associated with sulfide in certain preferred stoichiometries as described and taught herein.

PRIORITY DATA

This patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 from U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 60/970,644 entitled“COBALT-MOLYBDENUM SULFIDE CATALYST MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR ETHANOLPRODUCTION FROM SYNGAS,” filed Sep. 7, 2007, which is herebyincorporated by reference herein for all purposes.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of catalysts forthe chemical conversion of synthesis gas to alcohols. The inventionrelates to catalyst compositions, methods of using the catalystcompositions, methods of maintaining catalytic activity, and methods ofmaking catalysts.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Synthesis gas (hereinafter referred to as syngas) is a mixture ofhydrogen (H₂) and carbon monoxide (CO). Syngas can be produced, inprinciple, from virtually any feedstock material containing carbon.Carbonaceous materials commonly include fossil resources such as naturalgas, petroleum, coal, and lignite. Renewable resources such aslignocellulosic biomass and various carbon-rich waste materials can alsobe used to produce syngas. It is preferable to utilize a renewableresource to produce syngas because of the rising economic,environmental, and social costs associated with fossil resources.

There exist a variety of conversion technologies to turn these variousfeedstocks into syngas. Conversion approaches can utilize a combinationof one or more steps comprising gasification, pyrolysis, steamreforming, and/or partial oxidation of a carbon-containing feedstock.

Syngas is a platform intermediate in the chemical and biorefiningindustries and has a vast number of uses. Syngas can be converted intoalkanes, olefins, oxygenates, and alcohols. These chemicals can beblended into, or used directly as, diesel fuel, gasoline, and otherliquid fuels. Syngas can also be directly combusted to produce heat andpower.

Since the 1920s it has been known that mixtures of methanol and otheralcohols can be obtained by reacting syngas over certain catalysts(Forzatti et al., Cat. Rev.—Sci. and Eng. 33(1-2), 109-168, 1991).Fischer and Tropsch observed around the same time thathydrocarbon-synthesis catalysts produced linear alcohols as byproducts(Fischer and Tropsch, Brennst.-Chem. 7:97, 1926).

Technology developers for these catalysts have included DowChemical/Union Carbide and Institut Francais du Petrole. Dow Chemicaland Union Carbide jointly developed a sulfided mixed-alcohol catalystbased on molybdenum, MoS₂ (Phillips et al., National Renewable EnergyLaboratory TP-510-41168, April 2007).

U.S. Pat. No. 4,752,623 (Stevens and Conway), originally assigned to DowChemical, discloses a catalyst for producing mixed alcohols from syngas,wherein the catalyst contains either molybdenum or tungsten, in additionto either cobalt or nickel, both components being in sulfided form.Stevens and Conway emphasize that it is not necessary for theirinvention that any particular stoichiometric metal sulfide be present.Sulfided cobalt is often assigned to CoS in the literature. Further,Stevens and Conway state that no advantage is realized by the presenceof sulfur in the feed.

Another development at Dow Chemical, related to a similar catalystpreparation by Dianis, involves addition of aqueous cobalt acetate toammonium molybdate in 30% acetic acid solution. Both the Dianis as wellas the Stevens/Conway approaches employ decomposition under N₂ at 500°C. Dianis mentions the presence of a peak in the powder X-raydiffraction pattern that is tentatively assigned to CoS₂, but there isno discussion as to whether the presence of CoS₂ is favorable orunfavorable (Dianis, Applied Catalysis 39, 99-121, 1987).

More recently, Iranmahboob and Hill (Catalysis Letters 78, 49-55, 2002)discussed similar catalysts for synthesis of higher alcohols.Iranmahboob and Hill found Co₃S₄ present in their better catalysts andCo₉S₈ present in their inferior catalysts. They hypothesized that, intheir system, H₂S evolution results in transformation of more-activeCo₃S₄ into less-active Co₉S₈.

The existing art provides little, if any, information concerningchemical or physical characteristics that tend to correlate with theperformance of cobalt-molybdenum-sulfide alcohol-synthesis catalysts,including Co—Mo—S, and similar catalyst systems comprising Ni and/or W.Particularly absent is information relating to preferred amounts ofsulfur, on a stoichiometric basis, relative to other major componentspresent. Also particularly absent is information relating to thepreferred nature of the physical and/or chemical bonds or associationsamong at least Co, Mo, and S.

In light of these shortcomings in the art, what is needed is a novel andnon-obvious discovery that reveals and distinctly teaches improvedcatalyst compositions in a manner that enables a person skilled in theart to make and use the catalyst compositions. Especially needed arepreferred methods of making these catalyst compositions, and preferredmethods of using these catalyst compositions, to convert syngas intoalcohols. An especially preferred alcohol is ethanol, which can replacegasoline and other liquid fuels, at least in part, today.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect of the present invention, compositions are providedfor catalyzing the conversion of syngas into products comprising atleast one C₁-C₄ alcohol, the composition comprising cobalt, molybdenum,and sulfur, wherein at least some of the cobalt and some of the sulfurare present as a cobalt-sulfur association, and wherein the molar ratioof sulfur to cobalt (S:Co) in the association is at least 1.2, the molarratio S:Co calculated after assigning some of the sulfur to molybdenumby assuming all molybdenum is present in the composition as MoS₂.

In some embodiments, the molar ratio S:Co is at least 1.5, at least 2.0,or between about 2.0 and about 4.0. The molar ratio S:Co can becalculated after assigning some of the sulfur to molybdenum by assumingall molybdenum is present in the composition as MoS₂, and aftersubtracting any elemental sulfur present. Optionally, S:Co can furtherbe calculated after subtracting any sulfur that is soluble in 3 N HCl.

In some embodiments, the cobalt is present in an amount between about3-21 wt %, such as about 10-16 wt %, of the composition. In someembodiments, the molybdenum is present in an amount between about 33-56wt % of the composition. The molar ratio of the molybdenum to the cobaltcan be from about 1.5 to about 8, such as about 2.

The sulfur can be present in a total amount of at least 40 wt % of thecomposition, such as about 42-44 wt %. The sulfur can include elementalsulfur in an amount of at least 100 ppm, such as about 150-5000 ppm orabout 300-1000 ppm of the composition. In some embodiments, at least0.02% or 0.05% of the sulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at55° C. In certain embodiments, between about 0.02% and about 0.1% of thesulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at 55° C.

In some embodiments, less than about 8%, preferably less than 3%, of thecobalt is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C. Incertain embodiments, substantially no cobalt is capable of leaching intoa 3N HCl solution at 90° C.

In some embodiments, less than about 0.5%, preferably less than 0.3%, ofthe molybdenum is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C.In certain embodiments, substantially no molybdenum is capable ofleaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C.

When, for example, alcohols are desired products from syngas using thesecatalyst compositions, the compositions of the invention can furthercomprise one or more base promoters selected from the group consistingof potassium, rubidium, cesium, barium, strontium, scandium, yttrium,lanthanum, cerium, and any combinations thereof.

One exemplary catalyst composition for catalyzing the conversion ofsyngas into at least some ethanol, comprises 13-15 wt % total cobalt,40-45 wt % total molybdenum, at least 40 wt % total sulfur, and aneffective amount of a base promoter, wherein (i) the total sulfurincludes between 250-750 ppm elemental sulfur; (ii) at least some of thetotal cobalt and some of the total sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfurassociation having a molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt (S:Co) of at least2.0, the molar ratio S:Co calculated assuming all molybdenum is presentas MoS₂, and after subtracting sulfur that is capable of leaching intochloroform or 3N HCl at 25° C.; (iii) less than about 3% of the totalcobalt is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C.; and (iv)less than about 0.5% of the total molybdenum is capable of leaching intoa 3N HCl solution at 90° C.

In a second aspect of the invention, compositions are provided forcatalyzing the conversion of syngas into products comprising at leastone C₁-C₄ alcohol, the composition comprising sulfur, a first element orplurality of elements E1 and a second element or plurality of elementsE2, wherein: E1 is cobalt and/or nickel; E2 is molybdenum and/ortungsten; at least some of E1 and some of the sulfur are present as anE1-sulfur association; and the molar ratio of sulfur to E1 (S:E1) in theassociation is at least 1.2, the molar ratio S:E1 calculated afterassigning some of the sulfur to E2 by assuming all E2 is present in thecomposition as E2S₂.

The molar ratio S:E1 can be at least 1.5, such as about 2.0-4.0. In someembodiments, the molar ratio S:E1 calculated after assigning some of thesulfur to E2 by assuming all E2 is present in the composition as E2S₂,and after subtracting any sulfur that is soluble in chloroform and/or 3N HCl.

In some embodiments of this second aspect, the sulfur can be present ina total amount of at least 30 wt % of the composition. The sulfur caninclude elemental sulfur in an amount of at least 100 ppm of thecomposition. In certain embodiments, at least 0.02% of the sulfur iscapable of leaching into chloroform at 55° C.

The molar ratio of E2 to E1 can be selected from about 1 to about 20. Insome embodiments, the molar ratio of E2 to E1 is from about 1.5-8. Thecompositions of this second aspect can also be characterized byleachability; in some embodiments less than about 8% of the E1 iscapable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C., and less thanabout 0.5% of the E2 is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at90° C.

The compositions of this second aspect can further comprise one or morebase promoters selected from the group consisting of potassium,rubidium, cesium, barium, strontium, scandium, yttrium, lanthanum,cerium, and any combinations thereof.

A third aspect of this invention provides methods of producing at leastone C₁-C₄ alcohol (such as ethanol) from syngas, the method comprising:

(a) providing a reactor;

(b) providing a first catalyst composition comprising cobalt,molybdenum, sulfur, and a base promoter, wherein at least some of thecobalt and some of the sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfur associationhaving a first molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt, calculated by assumingall molybdenum is present as MoS₂;

(c) activating the first catalyst composition by contact with a streamcomprising syngas, under suitable conditions for catalyst activation,thereby producing a second catalyst composition having a second molarratio of sulfur to cobalt; and

(d) flowing syngas into the reactor at conditions effective to produceat least one C₁-C₄ alcohol,

wherein the second molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt is lower than thefirst molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt.

In some of these methods, the first molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt isat least 1.2. In some embodiments, the second molar ratio of sulfur tocobalt is 1.5 or less, such as 0.5 or less. In certain embodiments, thefirst molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt is at least 2 and the second molarratio of sulfur to cobalt is 1.4 or less.

The activating step (c) can be performed within the reactor provided instep (a).

In some embodiments of this third aspect, a first amount of total cobaltcontained in the first catalyst composition is capable of leaching intoa 3N HCl solution, a second amount of total cobalt contained in thesecond catalyst composition is capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution, and the second amount of cobalt is greater than the firstamount of cobalt.

The first amount of total cobalt capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution can be less than about 10%. The second amount of total cobaltcapable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution can be greater than about40%.

In a fourth aspect of the invention, activated catalyst compositions areproduced by the process of:

(a) providing a precursor catalyst composition comprising cobalt,molybdenum, sulfur, and a base promoter, wherein at least some of thecobalt and some of the sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfur associationhaving a first molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt, calculated by assumingall molybdenum is present as MoS₂; and

(b) activating the precursor catalyst composition by contact with astream comprising syngas, under suitable conditions for catalystactivation, thereby producing a second catalyst composition having asecond molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt,

wherein the second molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt is lower than thefirst molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt.

In some embodiments, the first molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt is atleast 1.2. In some embodiments, the second molar ratio of sulfur tocobalt is 1.5 or less.

The compositions can include a first amount of total cobalt contained inthe precursor catalyst composition, which first total cobalt amount iscapable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution, and a second amount of totalcobalt contained in the activated catalyst composition, which secondtotal cobalt amount is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution. Thesecond amount of cobalt is greater than the first amount of cobalt, insome embodiments.

A fifth aspect of this invention provides methods of producing at leastone C₁-C₄ alcohol from syngas, the method comprising:

(a) providing a reactor including a catalyst composition comprisingcobalt, molybdenum, and sulfur, wherein at least some of the cobalt andsome of the sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfur association having amolar ratio of sulfur to cobalt (S:Co), calculated by assuming allmolybdenum is present as MoS₂;

(b) flowing syngas into the reactor at conditions effective to produceat least one C₁-C₄ alcohol; and

(c) injecting additional sulfur, or a compound containing sulfur, intothe reactor in an amount that is sufficient to maintain at least some ofthe cobalt in a sulfided state, and is further sufficient to maintainthe molybdenum in a completely sulfided state.

In some embodiments, the molar ratio S:Co is controlled to between about0.1 and about 4, such as to a ratio of at least 1.

The additional sulfur injected in step (c) of this fifth aspect can becontained in one or more compounds selected from the group consisting ofelemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, methylthiol,ethylthiol, cysteine, cystine, methionine, potassium disulfide, cesiumdisulfide, and sodium disulfide.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the effect of catalyst type and reactortemperature on experimental total-liquids yield.

FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the effect of catalyst type and reactortemperature on experimental ethanol yield.

FIG. 3 is a chart showing S:Co molar ratios associated with certainpreferred catalyst compositions.

FIG. 4 is a chart showing S:Co molar ratios associated with certainpreferred catalyst compositions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

This description will enable one skilled in the art to make and use theinvention, and it describes several embodiments, adaptations,variations, alternatives, and uses of the invention, including what ispresently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the invention. Asused in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms“a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearlyindicates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical andscientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonlyunderstood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this inventionbelongs.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing reaction conditions,stoichiometries, concentrations of components, and so forth used in thespecification and claims are to be understood as being modified in allinstances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to thecontrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the followingspecification and attached claims are approximations that may varydepending at least upon the specific analytical technique. Any numericalvalue inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from thestandard deviation found in its respective testing measurements.

The present invention will now be described by reference to thefollowing detailed description, which characterizes some preferredembodiments but is by no means limiting.

For present purposes, “catalyst composition” means a composition of acatalytic material that is not activated. An “activated catalystcomposition” is a composition of a catalytic material that is suitablyactivated (or regenerated). By “activated” it is meant that the catalystis exposed to conditions (such as, but not necessarily, reactorconditions) that render it more suitable for its intended purpose, whichin this case means the conversion of syngas to alcohols.

Base promoters can enhance the production of alcohols from syngas. By“base promoter” it is meant one or more metals that promote theproduction of alcohols. Base promoters may be present in free orcombined form. The base promoter can be present as a metal, oxide,carbonate, hydroxide, sulfide, as a salt, in a compound with anothercomponent, or some combination of the above.

It has been discovered that preferred variants of catalyst compositionsfor converting syngas to alcohols (e.g., C₁-C₄ alcohols) comprisecobalt-molybdenum-sulfide powders which have certain characteristicchemical signatures. These preferred catalyst compositions arerelatively rich in sulfur. Specifically, the amount of sulfur present inpreferred catalysts is higher than would be expected by a skilledartisan, based on typical oxidation numbers of cobalt and molybdenum insulfide compounds.

In some embodiments, the amount of sulfur present is in excess of thatexpected if cobalt occurs as CoS₂ and molybdenum occurs as MoS₂. In somepreferred embodiments, the amount of sulfur present is in excess of thatexpected if cobalt occurs as Co₃S₄ and molybdenum occurs as MoS₂, aswill be described in more detail below and in Examples 1 and 2.

Additionally, preferred compositions of cobalt-molybdenum-sulfidealcohol-synthesis catalysts are relatively unreactive toward gentleleaching into non-oxidizing aqueous mineral acids, such as hydrochloricacid. Furthermore, preferred variants of cobalt-molybdenum-sulfidecatalysts are slightly more reactive toward sulfur leaching intosolvents such as chloroform, as compared to less-preferred catalystcompositions.

As used herein, chloroform leaching of elemental sulfur refers to ananalytical extraction of the sulfur into substantially pure chloroform(CHCl₃), conducted at a temperature selected from about 20° C. to about55° C. or higher, and preferably at about 55° C. As is known, a varietyof solvents are capable of extracting elemental sulfur into solution. Itis preferable, but not critical, that chloroform is used. Other solventsthat can be effective include toluene, methylene chloride, xylenes,benzene, acetone, carbon tetrachloride, and carbon disulfide. Somecompositions of the present invention will be described in terms ofchloroform leaching, and it will be appreciated that similar results canbe obtained by leaching into other solvents effective for elementalsulfur.

As used herein, hydrochloric acid leaching of a metal refers to ananalytical extraction of the metal into a solution of 3N HCl, conductedat room temperature (such as about 25° C.) or at higher temperature(such as about 90° C.). Other acids can be effective. Generally, amoderately strong, non-oxidizing mineral acid is preferred. For example,dilute solutions of one or more acids selected from HBr, HI, HBF₄, orHPF₆ can be used. Preferably, acid concentrations for the leaching testsare low enough to avoid possible total digestion of the material. InHCl, which is preferred, an additional role of chloride is thought tostabilize oxospecies of molybdenum in the leachate with respect toreprecipitation. It is noted that a metal may be leached innon-elemental forms, such as aqueous cations or aqueous salts.

In some embodiments of Co—Mo—S catalyst compositions provided by thepresent invention, sulfur is present in a total (free or combined form)amount of at least 40 wt % of the catalyst composition. In somepreferred embodiments, total sulfur is between 42-44 wt % of thecomposition.

Preferred compositions do not contain very much elemental sulfur(typically regarded as S₈); i.e., they are not a mere physical mixtureof sulfur with the other elements present. A non-zero amount ofelemental sulfur can be present in preferred compositions. Namely,favored sulfided catalysts include elemental sulfur in an amount of atleast about 100 ppm, calculated on a total-catalyst weight basis. Theconcentration of elemental sulfur is preferably between about 150-5000ppm, more preferably between about 300-1000 ppm. Amounts higher than5000 ppm of elemental sulfur can be effective from a catalysisstandpoint, but there are practical concerns. For example, high levelsof elemental sulfur in the compositions can melt and/or sublime in thecatalyst bed, leading to operational problems. High levels of elementalsulfur could also lead to undesired formation of hydrogen sulfide orcarbonyl sulfide.

The amount of elemental sulfur present in preferred catalysts can alsobe related to convenient chloroform leaching tests as described above.In certain embodiments, at least about 0.02% (but preferably not morethan about 0.1%) of the total sulfur present is capable of leaching intochloroform. It is preferable that at least about 0.05% of the sulfur becapable of leaching into chloroform.

Preferred catalyst compositions for converting syngas into alcohols arehighly sulfided, with cobalt associated with sulfide. In someembodiments, dispersed and crystalline CoS₂ is present in thesecatalysts. It is known that high-valency transition metals can oxidizesulfur to disulfide (S₂ ²⁻) or even polysulfide species, with associatedreduction at the metal center. Polysulfides are anions with the generalformula S_(n) ²⁻ (n>2) and the general structure ⁻SS_(n−2)S⁻.

The molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt (“S:Co”), given an initialassignment of sulfur to molybdenum to yield MoS₂, is regarded as animportant parameter. As used herein, S:Co is calculated after assigningsome of the sulfur to molybdenum by assuming all molybdenum is presentin the catalyst composition as MoS₂. The S:Co molar ratio can optionallybe calculated after subtracting sulfur that is capable of leaching intochloroform (or a similarly effective solvent), which will tend toaccount for elemental sulfur. The S:Co molar ratio can also optionallybe calculated after subtracting sulfur that is capable of leaching into3 N HCl (or a similarly effective dilute acid), which will tend toaccount for sulfur in the form of sulfates, sulfites, persulfates,hyposulfites, and the like. In some embodiments, the S:Co molar ratiocan be calculated to account for all forms of sulfur that are soluble in(i.e., capable of leaching into) both chloroform and 3 N HCl. Preferredcompositions do not have excessive amounts of these forms of sulfur, sothe calculated S:Co molar ratios are typically not especially sensitiveto the exclusion of sulfur species that are soluble in chloroform and/or3 N HCl.

The S:Co molar ratio in the cobalt-sulfur association is at least about1.2. Preferably, the molar ratio S:Co is at least about 1.5, and morepreferably at least about 2.0. In some embodiments, S:Co is betweenabout 2.0 and about 4.0. For example, for illustration purposes only,various specific embodiments of the invention can employ S:Co ratios ofabout 1.2, 1.3, 1.35 (i.e., slightly higher than what would be expectedif cobalt were present as CO₃S₄), 1.4, 1.5, 1.75, 1.95, or 2.0. Variousother specific embodiments can use S:Co ratios of about 2.05, 2.1, 2.2,2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, or 3.0. In other embodiments, S:Coratios can exceed 3.0, such as up to and including about 4.0 or higher.These higher S:Co ratios can occur, for instance, when polysulfideanions are associated with cobalt.

In some embodiments of Co—Mo—S catalyst compositions, cobalt is presentin an amount between about 3-21 wt %, preferably between about 10-16 wt%, and more preferably between about 13-15 wt % (wherein wt % is weightpercent based on the total catalyst composition). In some embodiments ofCo—Mo—S catalyst compositions, molybdenum is present in an amountbetween about 33-56 wt %, preferably between about 35-50 wt %, and morepreferably between about 40-45 wt %.

In preferred embodiments, the molar ratio of molybdenum to cobalt,Mo:Co, can generally be between about 1 and about 20, preferably betweenabout 1.5 and about 8, and more preferably about 2.

The mass fraction of total sulfur (i.e. sulfur in free or combined form)is preferably greater than 40 wt % for catalyst compositions when theMo:Co mole ratio is about 2. Alcohol-synthesis catalysts can, however,use Mo:Co mole ratios different from 2, as described above. As the Mo:Comole ratio varies, the desirable mass fraction of sulfur will alsopreferably vary. In preferred embodiments, the catalyst compositionincludes sufficient sulfur so that all Mo can occur as MoS₂, withadditional sulfur so as to maintain cobalt in a sulfided state.

It is preferable that the catalyst composition includes sulfur in anoxidation state that is relatively high, for the sulfur in associationwith cobalt. In some embodiments, the average oxidation number forsulfur in association with cobalt is greater than −2, preferably atleast about −1.5, and more preferably about −1. Average sulfur oxidationstates can be in the range of −2 to −1 or higher, according to thepresent invention, for the sulfur in association with cobalt.

In Co₃S₄, wherein S:Co=1.33, the oxidation number of cobalt is both +2and +3 (formally Co₃S₄ is [Co(II)][Co(III)]₂S₄). The average oxidationstate of sulfur in Co₃S₄ is −2. In CoS₂, wherein S:Co=2, the oxidationnumber of cobalt is +2 and the sulfur oxidation number is −1.Cobalt-sulfur associations having higher S:Co molar ratios are expectedto have higher (less negative) sulfur oxidation numbers. In light of thepreferred S:Co molar ratios as described above, preferred embodiments ofthe catalyst compositions of the invention will include at least aportion of sulfur in the −1 oxidation state.

The amount and nature of cobalt present in preferred catalysts can berelated to convenient hydrochloric acid leaching tests as describedabove. In some embodiments, less than about 8% of the total cobaltpresent is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution. It is preferablethat less than about 5%, 3%, 2%, 1%, or less (including substantiallynone) of the total cobalt is capable of leaching into 3N HCl.“Substantially none” means that no metal is measured by standarddetection techniques, but a small amount may in fact be present in the3N HCl leachate.

The amount and nature of molybdenum present in preferred catalysts canbe related as well to these convenient hydrochloric acid leaching tests.In some embodiments, less than about 1.0% of the total molybdenumpresent is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution. It is preferablethat less than about 0.5%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, or less (includingsubstantially none) of the total molybdenum is capable of leaching into3N HCl.

Other aspects of the invention relate to preferred sulfidestoichiometries pertaining to nickel-molybdenum-sulfide,cobalt-tungsten-sulfide, and nickel-tungsten-sulfide catalystcompositions. When Ni is employed rather than Co, the amount of sulfurpresent will be in excess of that which would be expected if Mo occursas MoS₂ and Ni as NiS. When tungsten is used rather than molybdenum, theamount of sulfur present will be in excess of that which would occur ifcobalt were present as CoS, or nickel as NiS, and tungsten present asWS₂.

Some embodiments of the present invention provide a catalyst compositionfor catalyzing the conversion of syngas into alcohols, the compositioncomprising sulfur, a first element or plurality of elements E1 and asecond element or plurality of elements E2, wherein: E1 is cobalt and/ornickel; E2 is molybdenum and/or tungsten; at least some of E1 and someof the sulfur are present as an E1-sulfur association; and the molarratio of sulfur to E1 (S:E1) in the association is at least 1.2, themolar ratio S:E1 calculated after assigning some of the sulfur to E2 byassuming all E2 is present in the composition as E2S₂, and optionallyafter subtracting any sulfur that is soluble in chloroform and/or 3 NHCl. In certain embodiments, the molar ratio S:E1 is at least 1.5,preferably between about 2.0 and about 4.0, selected in a similar manneras described above for S:Co.

E1 can be present in an amount between about 2 wt % and about 25 wt %,and E2 can be present in an amount between about 25 wt % and about 95 wt% of the composition. In some embodiments, E1 is present in an amountbetween about 10-25 wt % of the composition, and E2 is present in anamount between about 25-60 wt %.

In some embodiments, total sulfur is present in a total amount of atleast 30 wt % of the composition. This total sulfur preferably includesat least 100 ppm elemental sulfur. In certain preferred embodiments, atleast 0.02% of the sulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at 25°C. In preferred embodiments, less than about 5% of E1 and less thanabout 0.5% of E2 is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 25° C.

Generally, preferred Ni—Mo—S, Co—W—S, or Ni—W—S catalysts will besimilarly resistant toward leaching metals into gentle mineral acid, asare preferred Co—Mo—S catalysts. As will be appreciated by a skilledartisan, similar methods can be recited for catalysts containing complexmixtures, such as Co—Ni—Mo—W—S catalysts.

Aspects of the present invention also relate to methods of making thesecatalyst compositions. The catalytic species may be dispersed by methodsknown in the art. Examples include impregnation from solution followedby conversion to the sulfided species or intimate physical mixing. Oneor more of these methods may be used. It is preferred that at least twoof the catalytic components (i) Mo and/or W, (ii) Co and/or Ni, and(iii) S are intimately mixed. More preferably, all of these catalystcomponents are substantially intimately mixed.

In some embodiments, the catalyst composition further includes at leastone base promoter which can increase selectivities to alcohols fromsyngas. In some embodiments, at least one base promoter includes one ormore elements selected from the group consisting of potassium, rubidium,cesium, barium, strontium, scandium, yttrium, lanthanum, or cerium, infree or combined form.

The base promoter is preferably at least present at a level sufficientto render the catalyst more basic. The base promoter is generallypresent in an amount of at least about 0.01 wt %, with metal promoterscalculated as if a free element in the catalyst. Preferably, the basepromoter is present in an amount of at least 0.1 wt %, more preferablybetween about 1 wt % and 20 wt %.

The base promoter may be added as an ingredient to a catalytic componentor to a support, or may be part of one of the catalytic components or asan integral part of the support. The base promoter may be added to theactive catalytic element prior to, during, or after the formation of thesulfide. For example, physical mixing or solution impregnation may beemployed.

In certain embodiments of the present invention, ammoniumtetrathiomolybdate can by made by addition of ammonium sulfide solutionor hydrogen sulfide gas to a solution of a soluble molybdate, such as(for example) ammonium heptamolybdate. To this solution, cobalt acetatesolution may be added to provide a suspension wherein the Mo:Co ratio isabout 2. Without being limited by any particular theory, it is presentlybelieved that these embodiments take advantage of the insolubility ofthe [NH₄ ⁺]₂[Mo₂CoS₈ ²⁻] salt.

If Mo:Co mole ratios different from two are desired, some [NH₄⁺]₂[Mo₂CoS₈ ²⁻] salt still forms. When cobalt is in excess, it maycoprecipitate by assuring an excess of sulfide anion is present at thetime of cobalt precipitation, resulting in an intimately mixedprecipitate. This precipitate comprises an amorphous cobalt sulfide and[NH₄ ⁺]₂[Mo₂CoS₈ ²⁻] salt. If Mo is desired to be present in excess ofMo:Co=2:1, its precipitation may be favored by controlling thetemperature of coprecipitation at a temperature lower than about 50° C.Solubility of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate is rather strongly temperaturedependent, decreasing at lower temperatures. Nickel and tungsten reactwith very similar trends.

To the [NH₄ ⁺]₂[Mo₂CoS₈ ²] precipitate, an aqueous solution of, forexample, an acetate salt of a lanthanide-series metal or of barium orstrontium may be added by incipient-wetness impregnation. Thecomposition is then calcined under inert conditions, in certainembodiments. “Inert conditions” with respect to calcining means that (i)the atmosphere at the inlet to the calciner (or other apparatuseffective for calcining Co—Mo—S materials) is substantially free of O₂and H₂O, and further that (ii) separation of H₂O and volatile components(such as NH₃, S₈, and the like) from the solid catalyst phase isefficient. N₂ and Ar, if suitably free of contaminating water andoxygen, represent suitable carrier gases for the calcinations.

Alternately, the ammonium cobalt thiomolybdate may be calcined underinert conditions prior to addition of the base promoter. In this case,it is typically convenient to grind, under a substantially inertatmosphere, a salt (e.g., an acetate or carbonate salt) of a basepromoter such as potassium or cesium.

The catalyst can take the form of a powder, pellets, granules, beads,extrudates, and so on. When a catalyst support is optionally employed,the support may assume any physical form such as pellets, spheres,monolithic channels, etc. The supports may be coprecipitated with activemetal species; or the support may be treated with the catalytic metalspecies and then used as is or formed into the aforementioned shapes; orthe support may be formed into the aforementioned shapes and thentreated with the catalytic species.

In embodiments of the invention that employ a catalyst support, thesupport is preferably (but not necessarily) a carbon-rich material withlarge mesopore volume, and further is preferably highlyattrition-resistant. One carbon support that can be utilized is“Sibunit” activated carbon (Boreskov Inst. of Catalysis, Novosibirsk,Russia) which has high surface area as well as chemical inertness bothin acidic and basic media (Simakova et al., Proceedings of SPIE—Volume5924, 592413, 2005). An example of Sibunit carbon as a catalyst supportcan be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,617,464 (Manzer).

The present invention also relates to use of catalyst compositions. Insome embodiments of the invention, a reactor is loaded with a catalystcomprising a composition as described herein. A process streamcomprising syngas is fed into the reactor at conditions effective forproducing alcohols from the syngas.

In some embodiments, conditions effective for producing alcohols fromsyngas include a feed hydrogen/carbon monoxide molar ratio (H₂/CO) fromabout 0.2-4.0, preferably about 0.5-2.0, and more preferably about0.5-1.5. These ratios are indicative of certain embodiments and are notlimiting. It is possible to operate at feed H₂/CO ratios less than 0.2as well as greater than 4, including 5, 10, or even higher. It iswell-known that high H₂/CO ratios can be obtained with extensive steamreforming and/or water-gas shift in operations prior to thesyngas-to-alcohol reactor.

In embodiments wherein H₂/CO ratios close to 1:1 are desired for alcoholsynthesis, partial oxidation of the carbonaceous feedstock can beutilized. In the absence of other reactions, partial oxidation tends toproduce H₂/CO ratios close to unity, depending on the stoichiometry ofthe feedstock.

When, as in certain embodiments, relatively low H₂/CO ratios aredesired, the reverse water-gas shift reaction (H₂+CO₂→H₂O+CO) canpotentially be utilized to consume hydrogen and thus lower H₂/CO. Insome embodiments, CO₂ produced during alcohol synthesis or elsewhere,can be recycled to the reformer to decrease the H₂/CO ratio entering thealcohol-synthesis reactor. Other chemistry and separation approaches canbe taken to adjust the H₂/CO ratios prior to converting syngas toalcohols, as will be appreciated. For example, certain commercialmembrane systems are known to be capable of selectively separating H₂from syngas, thereby lowering the H₂/CO ratio.

In some embodiments, conditions effective for producing alcohols fromsyngas include reactor temperatures from about 200-400° C., preferablyabout 250-350° C.; and reactor pressures from about 20-500 atm,preferably about 50-200 atm or higher. Generally, productivity increaseswith increasing reactor pressure. Temperatures and pressures outside ofthese ranges can be employed.

In some embodiments, conditions effective for producing alcohols fromsyngas include average reactor residence times from about 0.1-10seconds, preferably about 0.5-2 seconds. “Average reactor residencetime” is the mean of the residence-time distribution of the reactorcontents under actual operating conditions. Catalyst space times orcatalyst contact times can also be calculated by a skilled artisan andthese times will typically also be in the range of 0.1-10 seconds,although it will be appreciated that it is certainly possible to operateat shorter or longer times.

In general, the specific selection of catalyst configuration (geometry),H₂/CO ratio, temperature, pressure, residence time (or feed rate), andother reactor-engineering parameters will be selected to provide aneconomical process. These parameters are not regarded as critical to thepresent invention. It is within the ordinary skill in the art toexperiment with different reactor conditions to optimize selectivity toa particular product or some other parameter.

Product selectivities can be calculated on a carbon-atom basis.“Carbon-atom selectivity” means the ratio of the moles of a specificproduct to the total moles of all products, scaled by the number ofcarbon atoms in the species. This definition accounts for themole-number change due to reaction. The selectivity S_(j) to generalproduct species C_(x) _(j) H_(y) _(j) O_(z) _(j) is

$S_{j} = \frac{x_{j}F_{j}}{\sum\limits_{i}{x_{i}F_{i}}}$wherein F_(j) is the molar flow rate of species j which contains x_(j)carbon atoms. The summation is over all carbon-containing species (C_(x)_(i) H_(y) _(i) O_(z) _(i) ) produced in the reaction.

In some embodiments, wherein all products are identified and measured,the individual product selectivities sum to unity (plus or minusanalytical error). In other embodiments, wherein one or more productsare not identified in the exit stream, the selectivities can becalculated based on what products are in fact identified, or insteadbased on the conversion of reactants. In the latter case, theselectivities may not sum to unity if there is some mass imbalance.Nevertheless, this method can be preferable as it tends to determinemore accurate selectivities to identified products when it is suspectedthat at least one reaction product is not measured.

“CO₂-free carbon-atom selectivity” or “CO₂-free selectivity” mean thepercent of carbon in a specific product with respect to the total carbonconverted from carbon monoxide to some product other than carbondioxide. It is the same equation above for S_(j), except that i≠CO₂ andj≠CO₂.

In various embodiments of the present invention, the product stream fromthe reactor may be characterized by CO₂-free selectivities of about10-40% to methanol and about 20-60% or higher to ethanol. In somepreferred embodiments, the ethanol CO₂-free selectivity is higher,preferably substantially higher, than the methanol CO₂-free selectivity,such as a CO₂-free selectivity ratio of ethanol/methanol in the productof about 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, or higher. The product stream can alsocontain more methanol than ethanol, on either a mole basis or acarbon-atom basis, in certain embodiments. The CO₂-free selectivityratio of ethanol to all other alcohols is preferably at least 1, morepreferably at least 2.

The product stream from the reactor may include up to about 25% CO₂-freeselectivity to C₃₊ alcohols, and up to about 10% to other non-alcoholoxygenates such as aldehydes, esters, carboxylic acids, and ketones.These other oxygenates can include, for example, acetone, 2-butanone,methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, methyl formate, ethyl formate, aceticacid, propanoic acid, and butyric acid.

Another aspect of the invention relates to methods for activating, orotherwise generating, preferred activated catalyst compositions. In someembodiments, an activated catalyst composition is prepared by firstproviding a starting catalyst composition comprising cobalt, molybdenum,and sulfur, wherein at least some of the cobalt and some of the sulfurare present as a cobalt-sulfur association, and wherein the molar ratioof sulfur to cobalt (S:Co) in the association is at least 1.2, the molarratio S:Co calculated by assuming all molybdenum is present in thecatalyst composition as MoS₂. This starting catalyst composition is thensubjected to a stream of syngas under suitable activation conditions,preferably in situ within the reactor, such that the S:Co molar ratio(calculated in the same way as for the starting catalyst composition)decreases to a ratio that is at least somewhat lower than the S:Co molarratio in the starting catalyst composition. In various embodiments, theS:Co molar ratio decreases to about 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1.0, 0.9,0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, or even less, provided at leastsome of the cobalt remains in a sulfided state.

In certain embodiments of this aspect relating to catalyst activation,with reference to the above-described hydrochloric acid leaching tests,a first amount of total cobalt contained in the starting catalystcomposition is capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution, and a secondamount of total cobalt contained in the activated catalyst compositionis capable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution. Preferably, the secondamount of cobalt is greater than the first amount of cobalt that canleach. For example, when less than about 5% of the total cobalt presentin the starting catalyst composition can leach into a 3N HCl solution,more than about 5% of the total cobalt present in the activated catalystcomposition can leach into a 3N HCl solution. When less than about 1% ofthe total cobalt in the non-activated catalyst composition can leachinto a 3N HCl solution, more than about 1% of the total cobalt in theactivated catalyst composition can leach into such a solution.

During activation, the catalyst can become more reduced, with evolutionof various light sulfur compounds such as H₂S, CH₃SH, CH₃SCH₃, CH₃CH₂SH,and the like. In some variations, it can be beneficial (but is by nomeans necessary) to add sulfide back to the activated or operatingcatalyst composition to compensate for the sulfur that evolves duringactivation or operation. Yet another aspect of the present inventionprovides methods to maintain certain sulfide levels in the activatedcatalyst compositions. In these methods, sulfur or a compound containingsulfur can be injected into the reactor, in an amount that is sufficientto maintain both the cobalt and the molybdenum in sulfided states.

In some embodiments of this aspect, additional sulfur is injected so asto control the molar ratio S:Co to between about 1.2 to about 2 orhigher, up to about 4. Catalyst samples can be analyzed to measure S:Coand, if needed, additional sulfur can be introduced. Alternately,experiments can be separately conducted to establish that additionalsulfur is necessary at certain times, or as a continuous injection inprescribed amounts, or some other program, in order to control(maintain) the S:Co ratio. S:Co is “measured and controlled” within themeaning herein whether the measurements are made prior to, or during,reactor operation.

In some embodiments, additional sulfur can be introduced by injecting,in dissolved form or another effective form, one or more compoundsselected from the group consisting of elemental sulfur, hydrogensulfide, dimethyl disulfide, methylthiol, ethylthiol, L-cysteine,D-cysteine, D,L-cysteine mixtures, L-cystine, D-cystine, D,L-cystinemixtures, L-methionine, D-methionine, D,L-methionine mixtures, potassiumdisulfide, cesium disulfide, and sodium disulfide. For the purpose ofadding to the reactor, one or more of these compounds can be dissolvedin, for example, toluene or other organic solvents. For the disulfidesof potassium, sodium, or cesium, effective solvents can be selected fromalcohols, short-chain polyethylene glycols, acetonitrile, DMF, DMSO, orTHF.

Here, “injecting” sulfur can mean feeding sulfur into the reactor at theentrance, or introducing sulfur into the catalyst bed in any other way.Injecting includes introduction of sulfur as part of a syngas feedstream that comprises sulfur. Injecting can also include shutting downthe normal operation of the reactor (syngas to alcohols) and thenflowing a sulfur-containing compound through the catalyst bed in somefashion, to cause a change in the S:Co ratio.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Performance of Compositions RF-1 and RF-2

Two catalyst compositions are produced and given the designations RF-1and RF-2. Both compositions generally comprise Co—Mo—S and are producedin a similar manner, according to the description herein above, but theultimate compositions that are obtained are different. The synthesis ofRF-2 employs conditions that tend to exclude the atmosphere to a greaterextent than the conditions for synthesis of RF-1.

In separate experiments, RF-1 and RF-2 catalysts are loaded into areactor and tested for their capability to convert syngas into liquidproducts including ethanol. In these experiments, the primary variablesare catalyst type (RF-1 or RF-2) and reactor temperature (310° C., 325°C., or 345° C.). A full-factorial experimental design is carried out,with 2×3=6 experiments. These experiments are each controlled to 30% COconversion by adjusting space velocities.

FIG. 1 shows the impact of catalyst and temperature on total liquidyield. FIG. 2 depicts the ethanol yield versus temperature, calculatedas grams of liquid product per gram of catalyst per hour, for the twodifferent catalysts RF-1 and RF-2. Also analyzed (not shown) are otheralcohols including methanol, propanol, and butanol; water; and organicacids. From FIG. 2, it is experimentally observed that RF-2 is thesuperior catalyst of the two at any of the temperatures tested.

Example 2 Characterization of Compositions RF-1 and RF-2

The two catalyst compositions tested in actual reactors in Example 1,referred to as RF-1 and RF-2, are characterized in this example. Theanalysis for both compositions includes LECO S analysis, to determinetotal sulfur content; leaching the materials with chloroform, to assessthe amount of elemental sulfur present; and leaching with 3N HCl, toassess the amount of hydrophilic, soluble sulfur, cobalt, andmolybdenum. Three separate samples for each composition RF-1 and RF-2are analyzed.

The mass fractions of total cobalt and total molybdenum are essentiallythe same for both RF-1 and RF-2, while the mass fractions of totalsulfur are different (see tables below). The wt % numbers indicate themean± standard deviation of the measurements. A t test value greaterthan 0.05 implies that there is no statistical basis to assert thatdifferences exist, for that particular parameter, between RF-1 and RF-2.

Total Co (wt %) Total Mo (wt %) Total S (wt %) RF-1 14.43 ± 0.84 44.8 ±2.2 38.70 ± 0.80 RF-2 13.67 ± 0.48 42.0 ± 2.4 42.71 ± 0.44 t test 0.090.07 6.1 × 10⁻⁶

The amount of elemental sulfur (chloroform-leachable sulfur) is higherin RF-2 than in RF-1, as shown below. RF-2 is slightly more reactivetoward leaching of elemental sulfur than RF-1. This result is consistentwith a more highly sulfided, less hydrophilic or oxophilic material forcatalyst composition RF-2.

Elemental Sulfur (wt %) RF-1 0.0088 ± 0.0031 RF-2 0.0382 ± 0.0045 t test4.3 × 10⁻⁷

More cobalt and molybdenum from RF-1 leach into 3N HCl solution thanfrom RF-2. The amounts of sulfur that leach into 3N HCl are comparablefor the two materials.

Leachable Material into 3 Normal HCl Aqueous Solutions wt % wt % wt %Leachable S Leachable Co Leachable Mo RF-1 0.365 ± 0.074 1.49 ± 0.181.08 ± 0.17 RF-2 0.432 ± 0.023 0.402 ± 0.042 0.125 ± 0.15  t test 0.081.1 × 10⁻⁵ 3.2 × 10⁻⁵

RF-2 is relatively non-reactive toward metal leaching by 3N HCl. Giventhe assumption that Mo is present as MoS₂, as described above, a molarS:Co ratio can be calculated and the degree of sulfidation can beassessed.

S:Co Mole Ratio RF-1 1.13 ± 0.27 RF-2 1.97 ± 0.25 t test 2.3 × 10⁻⁴

Given the results of Example 1 (e.g., FIG. 2) in conjunction with thecharacterizations in Example 2, preferential aspects of compositions forhigher-alcohol synthesis catalysts are revealed.

Example 3 Experimental Co:S Molar Ratios for Certain Preferred CatalystCompositions of the Invention

In this example, 18 distinct Co—Mo—S catalysts are synthesized in amanner experimentally similar to the procedure to synthesize RF-2 inExample 1. Due to imperfect process control, some variations incomposition arise. A representative reactor experiment at 325° C. and30% CO conversion (for reasons explained in Example 1) gives a liquidyield of about 0.21 g/g/hr and an ethanol yield of about 0.1 g ethanolper g catalyst per hour. With reference to the performance of RF-1 andRF-2, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the performance of this single catalystwas measurably better than RF-1.

All 18 lots of catalyst in this example are analyzed by the sametechniques as described in Example 2. It is of interest to consider theS:Co molar ratio, given an initial assignment of sulfur to molybdenum toyield MoS₂.

FIG. 3 depicts the S:Co molar ratios across the 18 lots of catalystssynthesized in this example, wherein S:Co is calculated aftersubtracting elemental sulfur as determined by leaching into chloroformat room temperature. This ratio varies between about 2.2 and about 2.7,with an average of about 2.4.

FIG. 4 shows the S:Co molar ratios across the 18 lots of catalysts,wherein S:Co here subtracts the sulfur species (presumably primarilysulfate) soluble in 3 N HCl, as well as the sulfur that is soluble inchloroform. This ratio varies between about 2.2 and about 2.9, with anaverage of about 2.5. The lowest S:Co ratio observed here, 2.2, exceedswhat would be expected if the sulfided components are present only asMoS₂ and CoS₂. Furthermore, the sulfur-to-cobalt ratio is significantlyhigher than what would be expected if cobalt is present as CoS and/orCo₃S₄.

Example 4 Evolution of Co:S Molar Ratios During Alcohol Synthesis

In this example, a Co—Mo—S powder with Mo:Co=2 (mole basis) and S:Co=2.1(assuming Mo is present as MoS₂) is provided. This powder is compoundedwith K₂CO₃ such that Co:K=1 (mole basis), mixed with a binder, andformed into catalyst pellets. These pellets are loaded into reactors andoperated under alcohol-synthesis conditions for varying periods of timeas follows: sample A at 90 hours; sample B at 200 hours; and sample C at500 hours. The pellets are then discharged under inert conditions andsubjected to chemical analysis. Note that the three different samplesherein are run in different reactors.

Catalyst sample A has a S:Co ratio of about 1.4 (assuming that Mo occursas MoS₂), and 40-46% of the cobalt leaches into 3N HCl solution. SampleB has a S:Co ratio of about 0.5, and 50% of the cobalt leaches into 3NHCl solution. Sample C has a S:Co ratio of about 0.9, and 39-42% of thecobalt is extracted into 3N HCl.

It is therefore observed that a substantial fraction (about 40-50%) ofcobalt is extracted into 3 HCl and the S:Co ratio varies from about 0.45to 1.4 even though, initially, S:Co was about 2.1 and only a smallportion (in the range of 0.5-7%) of cobalt leaches from the initialcatalyst. By contrast, 10% of the Co in RF-1 catalyst (Example 1)extracts into 3N HCl and the S:Co ratio in RF-1 catalyst is about 1.1. Alarge fraction (35-55%) of Co in catalytically used RF-2 catalyst isextractable into 3N HCl, while only 10% of Co in RF-1 is extractableinto 3N HCl.

In this detailed description, reference has been made to multipleembodiments of the invention and non-limiting examples relating to howthe invention can be understood and practiced. Other embodiments that donot provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein may beutilized, without departing from the spirit and scope of the presentinvention. This invention incorporates routine experimentation andoptimization of the methods and systems described herein. Suchmodifications and variations are considered to be within the scope ofthe invention defined by the appended claims.

All publications, patents, and patent applications cited in thisspecification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety asif each publication, patent, or patent application were specifically andindividually put forth herein.

Where methods and steps described above indicate certain eventsoccurring in certain order, those of ordinary skill in the art willrecognize that the ordering of certain steps may be modified and thatsuch modifications are in accordance with the variations of theinvention. Additionally, the steps may be performed concurrently in aparallel process when possible, as well as performed sequentially.

Therefore, to the extent there are variations of the invention, whichare within the spirit of the disclosure or equivalent to the inventionsfound in the appended claims, it is the intent that this patent willcover those variations as well. The present invention shall only belimited by what is claimed.

1. A composition for catalyzing the conversion of syngas into productscomprising at least one C₁-C₄ alcohol, said composition comprisingcobalt, molybdenum, and sulfur, wherein at least some of said cobalt andsome of said sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfur association, andwherein the molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt (S:Co) in said associationis at least 1.2, said molar ratio S:Co calculated after assigning someof said sulfur to molybdenum by assuming all molybdenum is present insaid composition as MoS₂.
 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein saidmolar ratio S:Co is at least 1.5.
 3. The composition of claim 2, whereinsaid molar ratio S:Co is at least 2.0.
 4. The composition of claim 1,wherein said molar ratio S:Co is between about 2.0 and about 4.0.
 5. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein said cobalt is present in an amountbetween about 3 wt % and about 21 wt % of said composition.
 6. Thecomposition of claim 5, wherein said cobalt is present in an amountbetween about 10 wt % and about 16 wt % of said composition.
 7. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein said molybdenum is present in an amountbetween about 33 wt % and about 56 wt % of said composition.
 8. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of said molybdenum tosaid cobalt is from about 1.5 to about
 8. 9. The composition of claim 8,wherein said molar ratio of said molybdenum to said cobalt is from about2.
 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein said sulfur is present in atotal amount of at least 40 wt % of said composition.
 11. Thecomposition of claim 10, wherein said sulfur is present in a totalamount between about 42 wt % and about 44 wt % of said composition. 12.The composition of claim 1, wherein said molar ratio S:Co is calculatedafter assigning some of said sulfur to molybdenum by assuming allmolybdenum is present in said composition as MoS₂, and after subtractingany elemental sulfur present.
 13. The composition of claim 1 or 12,wherein said molar ratio S:Co is further calculated after subtractingany sulfur that is soluble in 3 N HCl.
 14. The composition of claim 1,wherein said sulfur includes elemental sulfur in an amount of at least100 ppm of said composition.
 15. The composition of claim 14, whereinsaid sulfur includes elemental sulfur in an amount of at least betweenabout 150 ppm and about 5000 ppm.
 16. The composition of claim 15,wherein said sulfur includes elemental sulfur in an amount between about300 ppm and about 1000 ppm.
 17. The composition of claim 1, wherein atleast 0.02% of said sulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at 55°C.
 18. The composition of claim 17, wherein at least 0.05% of saidsulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at 55° C.
 19. Thecomposition of claim 17, wherein between about 0.02% and about 0.1% ofsaid sulfur is capable of leaching into chloroform at 55° C.
 20. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein less than about 8% of said cobalt iscapable of leaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C.
 21. The compositionof claim 20, wherein less than about 3% of said cobalt is capable ofleaching into a 3N HCl solution at 90° C.
 22. The composition of claim21, wherein substantially no cobalt is capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution at 90° C.
 23. The composition of claim 1, wherein less thanabout 0.5% of said molybdenum is capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution at 90° C.
 24. The composition of claim 23, wherein less thanabout 0.3% of said molybdenum is capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution at 90° C.
 25. The composition of claim 24, whereinsubstantially no molybdenum is capable of leaching into a 3N HClsolution at 90° C.
 26. The composition of claim 1, further comprisingone or more base promoters selected from the group consisting ofpotassium, rubidium, cesium, barium, strontium, scandium, yttrium,lanthanum, cerium, and any combinations thereof.
 27. A catalystcomposition for catalyzing the conversion of syngas into at least someethanol, said composition comprising 13-15 wt % total cobalt, 40-45 wt %total molybdenum, at least 40 wt % total sulfur, and at least 0.01 wt %of a base promoter, wherein: (i) said total sulfur includes between250-750 ppm elemental sulfur; (ii) at least some of said total cobaltand some of said total sulfur are present as a cobalt-sulfur associationhaving a molar ratio of sulfur to cobalt (S:Co) of at least 2.0, saidmolar ratio S:Co calculated assuming all molybdenum is present as MoS₂,and after subtracting sulfur that is capable of leaching into chloroformor 3 N HCl at 25° C.; (iii) less than about 3% of said total cobalt iscapable of leaching into a 3 N HCl solution at 90° C.; and (iv) lessthan about 0.5% of said total molybdenum is capable of leaching into a3N HCl solution at 90° C.